engineering.
Oops! Looks like your browser is out of date. Is this page displaying correctly? If not, try upgrading your browser or use a different one.

Senior Structural Engineer Edvis on clarity, collaboration and concrete savings

Edvis is part of AKT II’s London structures team. He works across projects at all stages – from concept design to site supervision – with a focus on clear communication, efficient design, and mentoring younger engineers.

What team and location are you in, and what projects are you currently shaping?

I’m part of the structural engineering team in London. I recently completed Stage 2 design for a new office development near Piccadilly and I’m now working on two West London projects: a new-build residential scheme in Chelsea, currently at Stage 4, and the adaptive reuse of a tower, under construction at Stage 5.

What problem did you solve recently that you’re quietly proud of?

On a complex geometry project with many structural connections, we needed a way to communicate loads clearly to the contractor. Together with the team, we developed a process using Rhino and Grasshopper to visually identify connections, compiled into an Excel database. This reduced errors and streamlined handover.

Who do you collaborate with most, and how does coordination flow?

Externally, I coordinate with architects and MEP engineers to ensure structural solutions integrate with the overall design. Internally, I work with our geotechnical, civil, façade and computational specialists. Being interdisciplinary helps us deliver cohesive, buildable solutions in a fast, straightforward way.

How do you communicate critical details to site teams?

Sketches are the most effective. In the office I use Bluebeam, but on site a quick hand sketch can solve queries immediately. I also overlay digital sketches onto site photos for added clarity.

How did you consider material efficiency or reuse on your last project?

At the office development near Piccadilly, sustainability was central. We reduced embodied carbon by adopting ribbed concrete slabs and optimising the grid, which cut concrete volume. This also lowered foundation loads, reducing foundation volumes.

What have you learned at AKT II in the last six months that changed your practice?

I’ve moved from learning to also teaching. Mentoring younger engineers has shown me that guiding others can be more challenging than learning yourself – but with clear communication we help colleagues grow and maintain high standards.

What are the digital tools you use most?

For communication I rely on Bluebeam. For design, I use SAP2000 and Rhino with Grasshopper. For complex geometry, our custom in-house tool Re.AKT is invaluable – it links different software platforms, speeds up modelling and reduces error risk.

Describe a constraint that defined your last project’s concept.

In central London, we often design around third-party infrastructure. On the office development near Piccadilly, we had to allow for both existing networks and the planned Crossrail 2 tunnels beneath the site. That meant carefully limiting pile depth and documenting assumptions to manage future risk.

A studio ritual or habit that improves your work.

Open communication. Whether through CPD sessions, training, or simply turning to a colleague at the desk, this culture of exchange directly improves the quality of our work.

Quickfire.

A detail you wish more people noticed: The structural solutions behind buildings and bridges – often invisible, but essential.

Best tip as a graduate: Don’t let software replace engineering judgement. Always know what results to expect.

An AKT II social you’d recommend: Any sport or active event – a good way to step away from the desk.

Sketch, model or calculation first? Sketch → model → calculation.

Shortcut you can’t live without: Win+E.

A talk or paper that changed your design: IStructE – How to Calculate Embodied Carbon.

Most useful site photo: Wide shots – you can always zoom in later and catch details you missed.

File naming rule you wish everyone followed: Start with date, then a short description under 80 characters.

If you could standardise one thing across projects: Complete calculations for all elements, consistently filed and documented.